Aureo raises $1.1M USD pre-seed investment. Read full announcement
Aureo
Back to Reports
Report

Limitations of Mexico’s Retirement Savings System (SAR) and Savings Alternatives in Mexico

This whitepaper examines Mexico's Retirement Savings System (SAR), a fragmented and underperforming framework that leaves millions vulnerable to inadequate retirement security.

January 13, 2026
120 min read
39 pages

What you'll learn

  • 1Why Mexico’s SAR (IMSS/ISSSTE/Afores + non-contributory pensions) faces structural constraints
  • 2How fiat monetary dynamics shape saving behavior and outcomes in Mexico
  • 3Practical comparative framework for evaluating savings vehicles
Limitations of Mexico’s Retirement Savings System (SAR) and Savings Alternatives in Mexico

Executive Summary

Overview

This whitepaper examines Mexico's Retirement Savings System (SAR), a fragmented and underperforming framework that leaves millions vulnerable to inadequate retirement security. Drawing on historical analysis, current data, and global benchmarks, it critiques the SAR's structural flaws—exacerbated by fiat money's inherent fragility—and positions Bitcoin as a resilient, high-yield alternative for long-term wealth preservation. Amid Mexico's aging population and escalating pension costs (projected at 7.8% of GDP by 2030), the report advocates a paradigm shift toward self-sovereign saving, leveraging recent 2024-2025 Afore reforms to enable diversified, productive investments.

Key Findings

Mexico's SAR, rated 69.3 in the 2025 Mercer CFA Global Pension Index (below the Netherlands' 85.4 but above the U.S.'s 61.1), covers only half the economically active population, hampered by informal employment and regulatory rigidity. Historical reforms—from 1997's shift to defined-contribution Afores to 2007's ISSSTE updates—promised sustainability but failed to address core issues: implicit debts (e.g., ISSSTE at 50% GDP by 2025), non-contributory burdens like the PBPAM (now 2,400 pesos monthly for 65+), and total pension spending hitting 1.78 trillion pesos (11% GDP) in 2025, surpassing health and education outlays.

Fiat currencies erode savings—e.g., 100 pesos from 1980 now worth just $0.04 adjusted for inflation—fostering impatience and consumption over accumulation. Mexico's crises (1982 Debt, 1994 Tequila) exemplify this manipulation, mirroring global trends: U.S. underfunded pensions (43 states), Japan's existential demographic risks. Informal saving (54.1% of 18-70-year-olds) signals demand for alternatives, yet voluntary Afore participation lags at 7.9% (2024).

Bitcoin as a Superior Vehicle

Bitcoin emerges as the antidote: scarce (21M cap), antifragile, and yielding 50% annualized returns over the past decade, outperforming traditional assets. A modest 3% allocation enhances 60/40 portfolios' Sharpe ratio, as seen in UK pension schemes like Cartwright's (using Onramp's MIC custody). In Mexico, Bitcoin's adoption surges for remittances and value storage, outshining SAR/Afores in sovereignty, inflation protection, and liquidity (see comparison table).

Recent reforms—October 2024's expanded limits (30% structured instruments, 12.5% REITs for youth) and August/November 2025 tweaks for simplified emissions and foreign-currency optimization—create opportunities for Afores to diversify into Bitcoin, boosting replacement rates and national growth.

Conclusions and Recommendations

The SAR's paternalistic model perpetuates weak incentives; true reform demands incorruptible money—scarce, secure, and portable. Policymakers should enable voluntary Bitcoin savings via Afores (mirroring U.S. IRAs/401(k)s) and advocate direct allocations without intermediaries. Civil society must push for regulatory evolution, drawing hope from institutional adoption.

Aureo Bitcoin, fresh from a $1.1M pre-seed (Early Riders, Oct 2025), offers tailored plans and white-glove MIC custody for individuals and Afores. Contact contacto@aureobitcoin.com to optimize your strategy.

This report calls for urgent action: Transition from fiat fragility to Bitcoin empowerment for dignified retirements and economic vitality.


Methodology

Purpose and scope

This report evaluates Mexico’s Retirement Savings System (Sistema de Ahorro para el Retiro, SAR) and compares it with alternative savings mechanisms used in practice in Mexico, with a particular focus on bitcoin as a long-term savings technology. The scope is retirement-oriented saving (multi-decade horizons), including both contributory schemes (e.g., Afores/IMSS/ISSSTE-linked structures) and non-contributory public transfers, as well as informal saving practices.

Research approach

The analysis follows a mixed qualitative approach grounded in:

  1. Literature review of pensions, retirement saving behavior, and institutional design;
  2. Historical and institutional analysis of Mexico’s pension reforms and system architecture; and
  3. Comparative framework to assess savings options using consistent criteria (incentives, third-party risk, liquidity, and inflation protection).

The report is primarily explanatory and evaluative. It does not attempt to produce new econometric estimates; instead, it synthesizes established sources and applies a structured comparison to the Mexican context.

Analytical framework

To compare SAR/Afores, informal savings, and bitcoin, the report uses a criteria-based evaluation centered on:

  • Control / sovereignty: the saver’s ability to hold and move wealth without discretionary third-party permission.
  • Inflation protection: the expected ability to preserve purchasing power over long horizons.
  • Third-party risk: exposure to custodians, administrators, political risk, and institutional constraints.
  • Liquidity: the ability to convert savings into spending power when needed, including under stress.
  • Regulatory / policy risk: exposure to rule changes, restrictions, or compliance burdens that can affect access, costs, or returns.

This framework is used to build the comparative table and to organize the conclusions and recommendations.

Data sources and evidence base

The report relies on publicly available, reputable sources across five categories:

  • International benchmarks for pension-system comparison (e.g., global pension indices).
  • Academic and policy literature on Mexican retirement saving and coverage challenges.
  • Official Mexican demographic and macro context (e.g., population aging projections, census-based statistics).
  • Public finance and budget reporting relevant to pension spending and fiscal sustainability.
  • Bitcoin market and institutional adoption evidence, used to support claims about long-horizon properties, custody models, and emerging institutional allocation practices.

Where journalistic sources are referenced, they are used to corroborate reported figures or public-policy developments and are treated as secondary support relative to official data and peer-reviewed or policy research.

Treatment of quantitative claims

Quantitative statements (e.g., pension spending levels, coverage rates, demographic projections, long-run inflation erosion examples) are presented as reported figures from the referenced sources. When the report makes comparisons across years or systems, it emphasizes order-of-magnitude relevance and long-horizon dynamics rather than short-term forecasting. Any figures that are sensitive to definitions (e.g., what counts as “coverage” or “informal saving”) are interpreted in line with the originating source’s methodology.

Limitations

This research has several constraints:

  • Data comparability: different institutions define coverage, replacement rates, and spending categories differently.
  • Timeliness: fiscal and demographic statistics are periodically revised; the report reflects the most recent referenced publications available to the author at time of writing.
  • Bitcoin-specific risks: bitcoin involves operational and custody risks, regulatory uncertainty, and short-term volatility; these risks are acknowledged and are central to the emphasis on minimum technical competence and robust custody.
  • Causality vs. interpretation: the report argues that fiat incentives materially affect saving behavior; this is an interpretive thesis supported by theory and historical context rather than a single causal estimate.

Practical and ethical note

This document is for research and educational purposes and should not be interpreted as individualized financial advice. Any allocation decisions should be evaluated against personal circumstances, risk tolerance, time horizon, and applicable regulations. 

About the Author

Santiago Varela is a Bitcoiner and freedom-tech advocate focused on the intersection of Bitcoin, energy, and long-term capital formation. He holds a B.Sc. in Economics from ITAM (Mexico City), where his graduation thesis examined pension funds, real savings, financial literacy, low time preferences, and the role of sound money in strengthening long-horizon economic outcomes.

Santiago is also cofounder at Kardashev BTC, a pioneering Latin American Bitcoin Mining Fund and the founder of La Casa de Satoshi (Mexico City), where he works to expand Bitcoin education and adoption while promoting open, censorship-resistant technologies. He is also deeply interested in energy systems, from hydrocarbons to renewables, and in building at the frontier where Bitcoin, energy, and AI converge, with a particular emphasis on the societal implications of energy abundance.

Learn more: https://linktr.ee/santiago.varela.b